Land use impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: An analysis of rejected offers (Record no. 134196)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02054nam a2200205Ia 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 241008s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und||
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1467-8276
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Rosenberg, Andrew B.
9 (RLIN) 122029
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Land use impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: An analysis of rejected offers
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. American Journal of Agricultural Economics
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2024
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 1217-1240
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Abstract The Conservation Reserve Program is the largest agricultural land retirement program in the United States, with more enrolled acreage entering the program through a competitive auction called the General Signup than any other component. In this study, we assess the land use impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program by observing the land use decisions of parcels following the 2016 General Signup. We estimate land use impacts using a regression discontinuity design based on the Environmental Benefits Index, the program's selection and ranking mechanism. Our estimates largely rely on the auction design of the General Signup, such that we observe the land use decisions of rejected offers. We also use information on the rental rates of these offers to understand what the program pays to retire land in different uses. We estimate that a marginal acre of land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program replaces 0.30 acres in cropland, 0.25 acres in mixed forage, 0.32 acres in grassland, 0.12 acres in idle or fallow land, and 0.01 acres in timberland. We also find that enrollments from newly offered fields are more likely to displace cropland and less likely to displace grassland than returning fields. Consequently, we estimate that new enrollments lead to 47% greater reductions in water-driven erosion and 12% greater reductions in wind-driven erosion, compared to fields with prior enrollment.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Land Policy
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Land Retirement
9 (RLIN) 122030
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Land Use
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Conservation
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Pratt, Bryan
9 (RLIN) 122031
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajae.12425">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajae.12425</a>
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha biblionumber 134196
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Dr VKRV Rao Library Dr VKRV Rao Library 08/10/2024 Vol. 106, No. 3   AI480 08/10/2024 08/10/2024 Article Index

Powered by Koha