000 | 01772nas a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 240802c99999999xx |||||||||||| ||und|| | ||
022 | _a0011-3921 | ||
100 |
_aSanchez-Capdequi, Celso _9119639 |
||
245 | 0 | _aCreativity, transcendence, and social constellations | |
260 | _bCurrent Sociology | ||
260 | _c2024 | ||
300 | _a235-252 | ||
520 | _aAs happens in the very notion of social creativity that presents itself objectified in different figures over time, in the same way the types of transcendence -as condition of posibility of creativity- change over time. We are going to analyze four socio-historical constellations of the creativity-transcendence binomial: The first of them is the one represented by a myth-ritual structure embodied by Homo Sapiens in primitive cultures; the second of them is the one that arises 500 B.C. ago with the “axial revolution†in China, India, Iran, Palestine and Greece supported by new carriers of creative action; the third of them is configured at the beginning of modernity in the 18th century, with the Protestant Reformation and immediately afterwards with the Enlightenment and Romanticism, supported by new carriers of creative action; the fourth constellation of creativity-transcendence emerges today with the convergence of technologies - nanotechnology, biotechnology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence - where the sense of human nature as a vector within a hybrid cognitive collectivity made up of humans and things is altered. | ||
650 | _a Modernity | ||
650 |
_a Social Constellations _9119640 |
||
650 | _a Sociology | ||
650 |
_a Transcendence _92214 |
||
650 |
_aCreativity _924477 |
||
700 |
_a Beriain, Josetxo _9119641 |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231190714 | ||
999 |
_c133519 _d133519 |